| Author: | Andreas Rumpf |
|---|---|
| Version: | 2.3.1 |
"The road to hell is paved with good intentions."
Nim offers multiple different memory management strategies. To choose the memory management strategy use the --mm: switch.
ORC is the default memory management strategy. It is a memory management mode primarily based on reference counting. Reference cycles are handled by a cycle collection mechanism based on "trial deletion". Since algorithms based on "tracing" are not used, the runtime behavior is oblivious to the involved heap and stack sizes.
The reference counting operations (= "RC ops") do not use atomic instructions and do not have to -- instead entire subgraphs are moved between threads. The Nim compiler also aggressively optimizes away RC ops and exploits move semantics.
Nim performs a fair share of optimizations for ARC/ORC; you can inspect what it did to your time critical function via --expandArc:functionName. Likewise, you can inspect the whole module via --expandArc:fileName.
--mm:arc uses the same mechanism as --mm:orc, but it leaves out the cycle collector. Both ARC and ORC offer deterministic performance for hard realtime systems, but ARC can be easier to reason about for people coming from Ada/C++/C -- roughly speaking the memory for a variable is freed when it goes "out of scope".
We generally advise you to use the acyclic annotation in order to optimize away the cycle collector's overhead but --mm:orc also produces more machine code than --mm:arc, so if you're on a target where code size matters and you know that your code does not produce cycles, you can use --mm:arc. Notice that the default async implementation produces cycles and leaks memory with --mm:arc, in other words, for async you need to use --mm:orc or --mm:yrc.
ARC/ORC are not threadsafe if ref or other automatically managed types are accessed across thread boundaries. Moving isolated subgraphs between threads is supported for ARC/ORC and the language has support for that in the form of isolate. The modes mm:atomicArc and mm:yrc do offer this thread safety -- at the cost of atomic instructions. Whether that cost is acceptable depends on your program, it hard to give general guidelines. On a modern CPU the potential speedups in the form of increased multi-threading capabilities should outweigh the costs of atomic instructions by far. On an embedded device the atomics would probably only hurt though.
mm:atomicArc is a threadsafe variant of ARC: All the optimizations in the form of move semantics etc are still applied. mm:yrc is the threadsafe variant of ORC.
YRC is a novel concurrent cycle collection algorithm -- these are beasts to verify and to get correct so there are dragons lurking here, use at your own risk.
Here is a comparison of the different memory management modes:
| Memory Management | Heap | Reference Cycles | Stop-The-World | Atomic | Valgrind compatible | Command line switch |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YRC | Shared | Cycle Collector | No | Yes | Yes | --mm:yrc |
| ORC | Shared | Cycle Collector | No | No | Yes | --mm:orc |
| ARC | Shared | Leak | No | No | Yes | --mm:arc |
| Atomic ARC | Shared | Leak | No | Yes | Yes | --mm:atomicArc |
| RefC | Local | Cycle Collector | No | No | No | --mm:refc |
| Mark & Sweep | Local | Cycle Collector | No | No | No | --mm:markAndSweep |
| Boehm | Shared | Cycle Collector | Yes | No | No | --mm:boehm |
| Go | Shared | Cycle Collector | Yes | No | No | --mm:go |
| None | Manual | Manual | Manual | Manual | Manual | --mm:none |
JavaScript's garbage collector is used for the JavaScript and NodeJS compilation targets. The NimScript target uses the memory management strategy built into the Nim compiler.